Prepared by The Moore Medical Group

Closing the Coverage Gap

A Financial and Clinical Case for Outsourced Hospitalist Coverage in Behavioral Health Facilities

Strategic Solutions for Behavioral Health Facility Leaders

Eric Moore, MD, MBA  |  Walter V. Murray, DBA, PhD, CPA

July 2026

Executive Summary

Behavioral health facilities across the United States are navigating one of the most severe financial and operational crises in modern healthcare history. Two converging forces are placing unprecedented pressure on facility margins: dramatic cuts to Medicaid reimbursement under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law on July 4, 2025, and relentlessly rising clinician compensation costs. Meanwhile, unmanaged medical comorbidities in psychiatric inpatients drive readmission penalties, extend lengths of stay, and compromise both patient outcomes and regulatory compliance.

This white paper presents a data-driven analysis of these challenges and introduces The Moore Medical Group (MMG) 3-Pronged Hospitalist Model as a structured, financially validated solution. MMG is a physician-led group founded in 2000 by Eric Moore, MD, MBA, with 26 years of exclusive focus on inpatient psychiatric and behavioral health facilities. The organization serves eight facilities nationwide, delivering more than 20,000 patient encounters annually.

The MMG model uniquely integrates (1) expert patient care through dedicated hospitalist coverage, (2) CFO/CPA-informed financial analysis, and (3) Joint Commission compliance support. The leadership team includes Walter V. Murray, DBA, PhD, CPA, whose three decades in healthcare finance enable genuine, facility-specific cost-benefit analysis rather than sales projections dressed in financial language.

Facility administrators who engage MMG for an exploratory conversation receive a complimentary, facility-specific cost-benefit review — a data-driven analysis of their current coverage costs, reimbursement exposure, and projected impact of the outsourced model. No commitment. No pressure. Only clarity.

Section 1

The Crisis — Two Forces Squeezing Behavioral Health Facilities

On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, Public Law 119-21), marking the largest Medicaid funding reduction in U.S. history. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that OBBBA will reduce Medicaid spending by approximately $911 billion over the 2025–2034 period — a 15% reduction in total federal Medicaid funding (Eleos Health, 2025; AMA, 2025).¹

$911B

Projected Medicaid cuts, 2025–2034

11.8M

Americans projected to become uninsured by 2034

22%

Lower behavioral health reimbursement vs. medical/surgical

Figure 1: OBBBA Medicaid Cut Breakdown by Provision ($B, 2025–2034). Source: CBO/Eleos Health (2025).

Figure 1: OBBBA Medicaid Cut Breakdown by Provision ($B, 2025–2034). Source: CBO/Eleos Health (2025).

Figure 2: U.S. Behavioral Health Services Payer Mix. Source: SAMHSA/KFF (2025).

Figure 2: U.S. Behavioral Health Services Payer Mix. Source: SAMHSA/KFF (2025).

1.1 The Policy Environment: OBBBA Medicaid Cuts

The legislation achieves these reductions through four primary mechanisms:

  • Work Requirements: Adults aged 19–64 in the Medicaid expansion group must complete 80 hours of work or qualifying community engagement per month — an estimated $326 billion in federal spending reductions over 10 years due to disenrollment (Urban Institute, 2025).²
  • Increased Administrative Burdens: Reversal of simplified enrollment processes ($122 billion in projected cuts), combined with more frequent eligibility redeterminations ($63 billion) (Eleos Health, 2025).¹
  • Provider Tax Restrictions: A moratorium on provider tax increases — a mechanism states use to fund Medicaid — projected to cut $191 billion in federal spending (Eleos Health, 2025).¹
  • State-Directed Payment Limits: Revisions to caps on directed payments, particularly to psychiatric facilities, projected to reduce federal matching payments by $149 billion (Eleos Health, 2025).¹

The CBO projects that by 2034, more than 11.8 million Americans will become uninsured as a direct result of OBBBA (AMA, 2025).³ For behavioral health, the impact is amplified: behavioral health reimbursement rates are already 22% lower than medical and surgical rates, and Medicaid finances approximately one-quarter of all behavioral health services in the United States (Eleos Health, 2025).¹

Impact on North Carolina behavioral health facilities: North Carolina’s behavioral health infrastructure was already strained before OBBBA. As of September 2025, the state had 3,403 licensed behavioral health beds statewide, with approximately 300 offline each day due to staffing shortages (Becker’s Behavioral Health, 2026).⁴ Annual admissions to the state’s three public psychiatric hospitals fell 73% — from 3,210 to 875 — between FY2013 and FY2025, even as demand for inpatient mental healthcare continued to rise (NC Health News, 2026).⁵

The University of North Carolina reports that nearly 4 million people — approximately 2 in 5 North Carolinians — live in a mental health professional shortage area, and more than 50% of children with mental health needs cannot access appropriate care (Carolina Across 100, 2023).⁶ With OBBBA reductions now law, freestanding psychiatric hospitals in North Carolina face disproportionate strain: they depend heavily on Medicaid reimbursement and lack the diversified revenue streams of general acute care hospitals.

1.2 Rising Provider Compensation: The Cost Side of the Squeeze

Even as revenues contract, behavioral health facilities face compounding pressure from rising clinician compensation. Hospitalist medicine — the physician specialty most relevant to inpatient psychiatric facility coverage — has seen consistent wage escalation over the past five years. According to Today’s Hospitalist 2024 Survey, mean compensation for all hospitalists reached $348,231 in 2024 — a 2.6% increase over the prior year (a roughly $18,000 year-over-year increase). Nonacademic adult hospitalists reported average compensation of $355,307, while local hospitalist group physicians averaged $380,431 (Today’s Hospitalist, 2025).⁷ The Doximity 2025 Physician Compensation Report placed median total hospitalist compensation at $326,116, and SalaryDr’s April 2026 verified data placed the median at $345,000.⁸

Table 1: Hospitalist Compensation Benchmarks (2024–2026)
Source Compensation Metric Value
Today’s Hospitalist 2024 Survey Mean compensation (all hospitalists) $348,231
Today’s Hospitalist 2024 Survey Mean comp — nonacademic adult hospitalists $355,307
Today’s Hospitalist 2024 Survey Mean comp — local hospitalist groups $380,431
Doximity Physician Compensation Report (2025) Median total compensation $326,116
SalaryDr (April 2026) Median verified compensation $345,000
BLS OEWS — Internal Medicine Physicians (May 2024) Median annual wage (proxy) $236,350
Figure 3: Hospitalist Annual Compensation Benchmarks (2024–2026). Sources: Today's Hospitalist, Doximity, SalaryDr.

Figure 3: Hospitalist Annual Compensation Benchmarks (2024–2026). Sources: Today’s Hospitalist, Doximity, SalaryDr.

Beyond physician compensation, behavioral health facilities carry substantial non-physician staffing costs. The OPEN MINDS 2023 industry survey reported an average turnover rate of 27.5% for behavioral health facility support employees in 2023, down from 31.28% in 2022.⁹ Ohio’s behavioral health workforce analysis reported that workforce compensation rates rose more than 10% in 2024, with agencies experiencing an average 41% workforce turnover (Ohio Behavioral Health Consortium, 2025).¹¹ The financial consequence is significant: turnover costs include recruitment, onboarding, temporary coverage, and training — expenses that accrue regardless of patient census. When a facility employs or contract-staffs physicians directly, it also absorbs the full cost of benefits, malpractice insurance, continuing education, and scheduling gaps. This fixed-cost structure becomes financially untenable when reimbursement rates decline.

Figure 4: Behavioral Health Staff Turnover Rate Trend (2021–2024). Sources: OPEN MINDS (2023); Ohio BH Consortium (2025).

Figure 4: Behavioral Health Staff Turnover Rate Trend (2021–2024). Sources: OPEN MINDS (2023); Ohio BH Consortium (2025).

1.3 Readmission Penalties: A Measurable and Preventable Cost

CMS’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals with excess 30-day risk-standardized readmissions, applying reimbursement reductions of up to 3% of all Medicare inpatient payments. For psychiatric facilities specifically, CMS tracks the 30-Day All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Following Psychiatric Hospitalization measure within the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR) program.¹²

According to CMS preliminary data released in September 2025, 240 hospitals (8.1%) are expected to face readmission penalties of 1% or more in FY2026 — the first increase in the number of hospitals facing such penalties in five years (Advisory Board, 2025).¹³ The average 30-day all-cause psychiatric readmission rate is approximately 20%, representing a substantial and measurable financial liability for facilities that lack active medical management of inpatient populations. The clinical rationale is well-documented: patients with behavioral health diagnoses have higher rates of medical comorbidity, and when those comorbidities are not actively managed during inpatient stays, they become drivers of readmission. Psychiatric patients who are readmitted within 30 days generate no additional net reimbursement — only costs.

Figure 5: Annual CMS Readmission Penalty Exposure by Rate (FY2026). Source: CMS HRRP; Advisory Board (2025).

Figure 5: Annual CMS Readmission Penalty Exposure by Rate (FY2026). Source: CMS HRRP; Advisory Board (2025).

1.4 Medical Comorbidities: The Clinical Root of Financial Risk

Approximately 50% of all psychiatric inpatients have active medical comorbidities — conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and respiratory illness that require ongoing medical management during a psychiatric hospitalization.¹⁴ This clinical reality has direct financial implications:

  • Length of Stay Extension: Research published in Psychiatric Services found that when medical comorbidity was a focus of care during psychiatric hospitalization, length of stay was prolonged by an average of 3.25 days (Dewa et al., 2002).¹⁵ Extended stays increase the probability of falling outside reimbursement windows.
  • Readmission Rate Doubling: Patients with unmanaged comorbidities have been shown to carry approximately double the 30-day readmission rate of patients without active medical complications, based on a consistent body of inpatient outcomes literature.¹⁴
  • Complication Risk: Psychiatric patients who develop medical complications during hospitalization — due to medication interactions, undetected infections, or unmanaged chronic conditions — face extended stays, potential transfer costs, and adverse outcomes that compromise quality metrics and Joint Commission standing.

Most behavioral health facilities, particularly freestanding psychiatric hospitals, do not employ or retain dedicated internal medicine or hospitalist coverage. Psychiatrists are trained to manage psychiatric conditions; they are not positioned to perform History and Physical (H&P) exams on admission, manage medication regimens for complex medical conditions, or provide the level of medical oversight that Joint Commission standards require. This gap — the coverage gap — is the precise problem The Moore Medical Group exists to close.

Close Section 1 ↑

Section 2

The Moore Medical Group — Background and Credentialing

The Moore Medical Group (MMG) is a physician-led hospitalist organization founded in 2000 by Eric Moore, MD, MBA. The group provides exclusively inpatient psychiatric and behavioral health facility coverage — not general staffing, not a broad healthcare agency, and not a vendor that pivots between specialties. This singular focus is a strategic differentiator: MMG’s clinical protocols, credentialing processes, quality improvement infrastructure, and financial models are all calibrated specifically for the behavioral health inpatient environment.

2.2 The MMG 3-Pronged Model: Architecture and Logic

The Moore Medical Group operates through an integrated three-pronged model. Unlike vendors that offer clinical coverage alone, MMG addresses the full anatomy of the crisis: clinical, financial, and regulatory. Each prong is necessary; none is sufficient without the others.

PRONG 1

Expert & Experienced Patient Care

Dedicated hospitalist coverage for all inpatient psychiatric populations

  • Histories & Physicals (H&Ps) on admission
  • Daily rounding & on-call coverage
  • Active management of medical comorbidities
  • Medication & antimicrobial management
  • Zero coverage gaps — Joint Commission ready

PRONG 2

Financial Analysis to Protect Your Margins

CFO/CPA-informed facility-specific cost-benefit review

  • Reimbursement exposure analysis under OBBBA
  • Break-even: outsourced vs. status quo
  • Readmission penalty savings projections
  • Net financial impact under multiple scenarios
  • Current coverage cost baseline analysis

PRONG 3

Compliance Partner for Clinical Excellence

Ongoing regulatory compliance and quality improvement

  • Joint Commission readiness — continuous
  • Antimicrobial management & infection control
  • CMS 30-day readmission penalty reduction
  • National Patient Safety Goals compliance
  • MMG University continuing education for staff
Figure 6: The MMG 3-Pronged Hospitalist Model. Source: Moore Medical Group.

Figure 6: The MMG 3-Pronged Hospitalist Model. Source: Moore Medical Group.

2.1 Organization Overview

MMG currently serves eight facilities nationwide, delivering more than 20,000 patient encounters per year. Every provider in the MMG network — including both physicians (MDs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) — is individually credentialed, screened, and trained through MMG’s proprietary Quality Improvement Program before deployment to any facility. MMG maintains coverage continuity across all patient populations, from child and adolescent psychiatry through adult and geriatric inpatient care.

The leadership team combines clinical depth with financial sophistication. Eric Moore, MD, MBA brings 26 years of exclusive hospitalist experience in psychiatric settings. Walter V. Murray, DBA, PhD, CPA contributes three decades of healthcare finance, business administration, and strategic planning expertise — enabling MMG to offer a genuine, executive-level financial analysis as part of its engagement process, not a sales estimate.

2.3 Why Integration Matters: The Structural Argument Against Piecemeal Solutions

Facility administrators frequently consider piecemeal approaches to the coverage problem: contracting a temporary agency to fill a clinical gap, or commissioning a consulting firm for a financial analysis. MMG’s integrated model addresses the core limitation of piecemeal solutions: the clinical problem and the financial problem are not independent.

Consider the following interdependencies:

  • Clinical coverage without financial validation leads facilities to commit resources to a model they cannot afford or cannot scale. A facility that adds coverage without understanding break-even creates a new fixed cost with uncertain return.
  • Financial analysis without clinical depth produces projections based on assumptions rather than facility-specific data. Savings estimates for readmission reduction, length-of-stay optimization, and comorbidity management require clinical expertise to model accurately.
  • Clinical and financial excellence without compliance creates regulatory vulnerability. Joint Commission findings related to H&P timeliness, medication management, or physician coverage documentation can result in accreditation jeopardy, CMS certification issues, or payer contract termination — all of which undermine the financial case for any model.

MMG’s three-pronged structure means that the financial analysis informs the clinical deployment, the clinical deployment is designed for regulatory compliance, and the compliance infrastructure supports the financial outcomes. This is not a marketing construct — it is the operational architecture that has sustained MMG’s client relationships across 26 years and 8 facilities.

Close Section 2 ↑

Section 3

Financial Validation — The Economics of Outsourced Hospitalist Coverage

When a behavioral health facility employs physicians or NPs directly to provide hospitalist coverage, it accepts a multi-component cost structure that extends well beyond base salary:

40–60%

Reduction in total operational costs from outsourcing

100%+

ROI within 12–18 months for mid-sized operations

3.1 The Cost Structure of In-House vs. Outsourced Coverage

  • Compensation: The current market for hospitalist compensation (all sources) ranges from $236,350 (BLS OEWS median, internal medicine proxy) to $348,231 (Today’s Hospitalist 2024 Survey mean for all hospitalists).⁷ ⁹ Locum tenens rates for temporary coverage run $140–$200+ per hour, annualizing to $280,000–$430,000+ for comparable coverage.⁹
  • Benefits and Overhead: Employer-side benefits — health insurance, retirement contributions, liability coverage, and administrative costs — typically add 25–35% to base physician compensation.
  • Malpractice Insurance: Malpractice premiums for internal medicine/hospitalist coverage in inpatient settings represent a standalone fixed cost borne by the facility when employing physicians directly.
  • Recruitment and Turnover: Behavioral health clinician turnover has ranged from 27–31% annually in recent industry surveys.¹⁰ Each physician turnover event generates substantial recruitment costs — including search firm fees (typically 15–25% of first-year compensation), temporary coverage gaps, and onboarding time.
  • Coverage Gaps: Employed models rely on individual physicians; when those physicians are ill, on vacation, or depart, coverage continuity is at risk. Joint Commission standards require documentation of physician coverage continuity; gaps create regulatory exposure.

Industry research published by Aspect Billing Solutions (2025) found these efficiencies are driven primarily by reduced staffing overhead, lower malpractice exposure, and faster reimbursement cycles.¹⁶

3.2 Reimbursement Exposure Analysis: OBBBA’s Direct Impact on Psychiatric Facilities

For behavioral health facilities that serve a Medicaid-dominant population, OBBBA’s reductions are not a theoretical future risk — they are current law. The legislation took effect upon signing on July 4, 2025, with phased implementation timelines for specific provisions.¹³

Facilities face exposure across multiple reimbursement streams simultaneously:

  • Direct Medicaid Rate Pressure: As states absorb federal reductions, state-level Medicaid rates for inpatient psychiatric services are at risk of compression. States will face difficult choices: reduce covered populations, reduce reimbursement rates, or absorb shortfalls — none of which are favorable for facility margins.
  • State-Directed Payment Reductions: OBBBA caps and reduces state-directed payments beginning in FY2028, at a rate of 10% per year until payment levels reach Medicare rates. For many facilities, state-directed payments represent a meaningful supplement to base Medicaid rates; their reduction will directly impact net reimbursement per case.¹⁷
  • CMS Inpatient Psychiatric Facility PPS: For FY2026, CMS finalized a 2.5% increase in IPF payment rates (approximately $70 million system-wide), providing modest relief.¹² However, this increase is implemented on a budget-neutral basis and does not offset OBBBA reductions for Medicaid-dependent facilities.
  • Readmission Penalties: The 240 hospitals facing 1%+ readmission penalties in FY2026 face these reductions on top of all other reimbursement pressures.¹³ For a facility receiving $10 million in annual Medicare inpatient payments, a 1% penalty equals a $100,000 direct reduction — preventable through active medical management.

$100K

Direct reduction from a 1% penalty on $10M in Medicare payments

10%/yr

Pace of state-directed payment reduction beginning FY2028

3.3 Readmission Penalty Savings: A Quantifiable ROI Driver

The financial case for outsourced hospitalist coverage in behavioral health facilities is most directly quantifiable through readmission penalty reduction. The MMG model’s active daily rounding, medication management, and comorbidity management are specifically designed to reduce the conditions that precipitate 30-day readmissions.

The savings calculation for any specific facility requires facility-specific data — which is precisely what MMG’s complimentary cost-benefit analysis provides. However, the general parameters are measurable:

  • Penalty Basis: CMS applies HRRP penalties as a percentage of all Medicare inpatient payments — not just payments for the penalized conditions. The maximum penalty is 3%; the average penalty among penalized hospitals has consistently run below 1%.¹³
  • Exposure Range: A psychiatric facility receiving $8–$15 million in annual Medicare inpatient payments faces a $80,000–$450,000 annual exposure range from readmission penalties alone, depending on penalty rate.
  • Reduction Opportunity: Reducing the 30-day readmission rate by even 3–5 percentage points — achievable through active medical management of comorbidities — can meaningfully reduce or eliminate penalty exposure.
  • Length-of-Stay Impact: Extended lengths of stay driven by unmanaged comorbidities (documented at 1.4+ additional days on average for patients with active medical comorbidities)¹⁴ ¹⁵ create both cost overruns and census management challenges. Reducing unnecessary length-of-stay extension improves throughput and optimizes per-case economics.

$80K–$450K

Annual readmission penalty exposure range

3–5 pts

Achievable reduction in 30-day readmission rate

1.4+ days

Average LOS extension from unmanaged comorbidities

“If the numbers don’t support the move, we’ll tell you that. That’s what CFO/CPA-informed analysis means.”

— The Moore Medical Group

Close Section 3 ↑

Section 4

Compliance and Quality — The Regulatory Imperative

The Joint Commission accredits inpatient psychiatric hospitals under standards that specifically govern physician coverage continuity, H&P documentation timeliness, medication management, and infection control. Accreditation is not optional for facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid payments — CMS uses Joint Commission accreditation as a basis for deemed status, and loss of accreditation can trigger loss of Medicare/Medicaid certification.¹⁸

24 hrs

Required window for H&P completion after admission

Deemed Status

Tied directly to Joint Commission accreditation

2 pp

Payment rate reduction for failing to report IPFQR data

2.5%

FY2026 CMS payment update for IPFs

4.1 Joint Commission Standards for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities

Key Joint Commission focus areas for psychiatric hospitals include:

  • History and Physical (H&P) Requirements: CMS and Joint Commission standards require that an H&P be completed within 24 hours of admission for all inpatients. In behavioral health facilities without dedicated medical coverage, this requirement is frequently managed through workarounds — including psychiatrist-completed H&Ps that lack the medical depth required for patients with complex comorbidities.
  • Medication Management and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Joint Commission standards require documented medication reconciliation, antimicrobial stewardship protocols, and management of high-alert medications. Psychiatric inpatients frequently present on complex medication regimens requiring medical oversight.
  • National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs): The Joint Commission’s NPSGs — including correct patient identification, medication safety, and infection prevention — apply to psychiatric hospitals. Compliance requires consistent physician involvement in safety protocols.
  • Environment of Care: Standards governing ligature risk, safety design, and physical environment require facility-level compliance programs that intersect with clinical quality management.

MMG’s compliance prong is designed to ensure that facilities maintain Joint Commission readiness at all times — not as a preparation event before a survey, but as a continuous operational standard.

4.2 CMS Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR)

CMS requires all IPFs that receive Medicare payments to report quality data under the IPFQR program. Facilities that fail to report required quality data receive a 2-percentage-point reduction applied to their annual payment rates — a direct and avoidable financial penalty.¹²

The IPFQR program tracks measures including:

  • 30-Day All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Following Psychiatric Hospitalization
  • 30-Day Risk-Standardized All-Cause Emergency Department Visit Following an IPF Discharge
  • Medication-Related measures for high-risk patient populations
  • Timely Transmission of Transition Record measures

Active medical management — including H&Ps, daily rounding, medication management, and discharge planning support — directly influences performance on these measures. MMG’s clinical model is specifically structured to support strong IPFQR performance, which in turn protects the facility’s full payment rate.

For FY2026, CMS also extended reporting period requirements for the readmission and ED visit measures to two-year windows — providing facilities additional time to demonstrate sustained improvement.

4.3 MMG University: Continuous Education as a Quality Investment

MMG University is the organization’s proprietary continuing education platform for facility staff. Continuing education in behavioral health settings serves multiple operational functions: it maintains licensure compliance for nursing and clinical staff, builds facility-level competency in medical comorbidity recognition, and supports the behavioral safety culture that Joint Commission standards expect.

Turnover in behavioral health settings — at an industry average of 27–31% annually¹⁰ — means that any given facility continuously onboards new clinical staff. MMG University provides a structured mechanism for maintaining care quality standards across staff transitions, reducing the knowledge gap that contributes to preventable adverse events and readmissions.

Close Section 4 ↑

Section 5

The Window for Action Is Narrowing

The OBBBA Medicaid reductions are not a future threat — they are current law, enacted July 4, 2025. Facilities that delay evaluation of their coverage model will face the full impact of reimbursement decline without structural changes in place. The strategic options available to facilities today will narrow as financial pressures materialize.

10–20%

Potential Medicaid rate reduction facilities should stress-test against

~100

Hospitals that closed inpatient mental health services over the last decade

~300

psychiatric hospital beds offline daily due to staffing vacancies (NC, 2024)

Three dynamics define the urgency:

Reimbursement Pressure Is Accelerating

State Medicaid rates are not static. As states absorb OBBBA-driven federal funding reductions, they will face choices between rate compression, benefit restrictions, and eligibility narrowing. Facilities that have not stress-tested their financials under multiple reimbursement scenarios — including a 10–20% reduction in Medicaid rates — may find themselves in a reactive rather than proactive position when those decisions are made.

Provider Shortage Is Not Easing

The behavioral health clinician workforce shortage predates OBBBA and will not be resolved by policy changes in the near term. Competition for qualified hospitalists — particularly those with inpatient psychiatric experience — will intensify as more facilities recognize the need for dedicated medical coverage. Facilities that establish MMG partnerships now will have consistent coverage; those that wait will compete in an increasingly expensive and competitive labor market for individual hires.

Psychiatric Unit Closures Are a Real and Present Risk

According to the American Hospital Association, nearly 100 hospitals have closed their inpatient mental health services over the last decade, with Medicaid funding instability cited as a primary driver (NPR, 2025).¹⁹ North Carolina alone has lost approximately half of its state psychiatric beds since 2016, with 300 of the state’s 901 psychiatric hospital beds offline as of late 2024 due to staffing vacancies.²⁰

Facilities that achieve financial sustainability through outsourced coverage models will be positioned to absorb the patient demand generated by closures elsewhere — a potential census and revenue opportunity for operationally sound facilities.

Proactive facilities will maintain both care quality and financial viability through the transition ahead. Reactive facilities will face forced cuts — to staffing, services, or both.

The exploratory call costs nothing and produces data-driven, facility-specific numbers. That is the starting point.

Close Section 5 ↑

Section 6

Engaging The Moore Medical Group — Process and Expectations

The MMG engagement process begins with an Exploratory Conversation — a complimentary, no-commitment, no-pressure conversation with MMG leadership to assess whether your facility is a fit for the 3-Pronged Approach. This is not a sales presentation. It is a structured exchange in which MMG collects the facility-specific data required to produce a genuine cost-benefit analysis:

~80%

Of engaged CEOs, DONs, and CFOs move forward with a partnership review

$0

Cost for the Exploratory Conversation and facility-specific analysis

6.1 The Exploratory Conversation: A Complimentary Facility-Specific Review

  • Current coverage structure — employed physicians, NPs, contracted coverage, or gap coverage arrangements
  • Annual compensation, benefits, malpractice, and recruitment costs associated with current coverage
  • Current 30-day readmission rate and any existing CMS penalty exposure
  • Payer mix — proportion of Medicaid, Medicare, commercial, and self-pay patients
  • Current Joint Commission status and any outstanding compliance findings

Following the Exploratory Conversation, MMG delivers a facility-specific financial analysis that includes: a current coverage cost baseline, reimbursement exposure modeling under multiple OBBBA scenarios, break-even analysis (outsourced vs. status quo), readmission penalty savings projections, and net financial impact under conservative, base, and optimistic scenarios.

Not because of sales pressure — because the financial analysis provides clarity that was previously unavailable.

6.2 Facility Eligibility Criteria

The Moore Medical Group partners with a limited number of facilities each quarter to ensure the highest quality of engagement. MMG prioritizes facilities that meet the following general criteria:

  • Freestanding inpatient psychiatric or behavioral health hospital (not a general medical/surgical floor)
  • Licensed and operating anywhere in the United States
  • Experiencing current or anticipated coverage gaps in medical/hospitalist coverage
  • Serving a primarily Medicaid or Medicare patient population
  • Leadership with decision-making authority over clinical coverage contracts

Facility eligibility can be determined through a brief online assessment, with results available immediately. Qualified facilities are invited to schedule directly with Walter V. Murray, DBA, PhD, CPA — at no cost and no obligation.

6.3 Confidentiality

All conversations, data shared, and financial analyses produced during the MMG engagement process are treated as strictly confidential. MMG does not share facility-specific information with competitors, payers, or any third parties. The exploratory process is designed to enable honest, data-driven dialogue — which requires that facilities can speak openly about their current challenges without concern for disclosure.

Close Section 6 ↑

Conclusion

Behavioral health facilities across the United States are operating in an environment defined by converging pressures: historically large Medicaid funding reductions, rising clinician compensation costs, regulatory penalties tied to readmission rates, and a workforce shortage that shows no signs of near-term relief. These are not cyclical headwinds — they represent structural changes in the behavioral health financing landscape that will reshape the operational viability of facilities over the next decade.

The Moore Medical Group offers a clinically grounded, financially validated, and compliance-oriented response to these pressures. The 3-Pronged Hospitalist Model — combining expert patient care, CFO/CPA-informed financial analysis, and Joint Commission compliance support — addresses the full anatomy of the crisis rather than any single component.

The case for acting now is made by the data: $911 billion in Medicaid reductions are law; 240 hospitals face readmission penalties of 1% or more in FY2026; 50% of psychiatric inpatients carry active medical comorbidities that drive readmission and extend length of stay; and the provider workforce shortage is tightening.

The question is not whether facilities will feel these pressures. The question is whether they will respond proactively — with data-driven structural changes — or reactively, when financial deterioration leaves fewer options.

The MMG exploratory conversation is the starting point: no commitment, no pressure, facility-specific numbers, and the clarity needed to make an informed decision.

Next Step

Schedule an Exploratory Call for a Complimentary Facility-Specific Cost-Benefit Review

We invite you to explore whether The Moore Medical Group approach is right for your facility. Our initial engagement is straightforward and without obligation.

Get a free download of the White Paper when you schedule your Complimentary Review
No Commitment
No Pressure
Data-Driven Clarity About Your Options
Facility-Specific Numbers — Not Generic Estimates
Schedule Your Complimentary Review

Scheduling takes less than 2 minutes. All conversations are confidential.

References and Sources

All data cited in this white paper is drawn from publicly verifiable, authoritative sources.

  1. Eleos Health. (2025). OBBBA and Medicaid Funding Status: What Behavioral Health Leaders Need to Know.
  2. Urban Institute. (2025, August 6). Medicaid Cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Leave 3 in 10 Young Adults Vulnerable to Losing Coverage.
  3. American Medical Association. (2025, July 3). Changes to Medicaid, the ACA and Other Key Provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
  4. Becker’s Behavioral Health. (2026, February 11). North Carolina Psych Admissions Fall 73% as 300 Beds Sit Unused.
  5. North Carolina Health News. (2026, February 12). Who Gets a Bed in NC’s State Psychiatric Hospitals — and Who Waits?
  6. University of North Carolina, Carolina Across 100. (2023, October). Responding to North Carolina’s Behavioral Health Workforce Crisis.
  7. Today’s Hospitalist. (2025, August). Hospitalist Pay Overview: Compensation Continues to Rise.
  8. Today’s Hospitalist. (2025, June). Hospitalist Pay by Group Type: Who Is the Highest Paid?
  9. Barton Associates. (2026). Hospitalist Salary 2026: Pay, Shift Rates, and Locum Income.
  10. OPEN MINDS. (2025). 2023 Turnover at Behavioral Health Facilities Decreases to 27.5%.
  11. Ohio Behavioral Health Consortium. (2025, February). Ohio’s Behavioral Health Workforce Crisis: The Missing Link to Recovery.
  12. Applied Policy / CMS. (2025, August). CMS Finalizes FY 2026 Payment Update and Quality Changes for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities.
  13. Advisory Board. (2025, September 22). Charted: More Hospitals to Face Readmission Penalties in 2026.
  14. Multiple Sources: Moore Medical Group internal clinical data; peer-reviewed literature on psychiatric comorbidity and inpatient outcomes.
  15. Dewa, C. S., et al. (2002). Medical Comorbidity in Psychiatric Inpatients: Relation to Clinical Outcomes. Psychiatric Services.
  16. Aspect Billing Solutions. (2025). Outsourcing Medical Billing vs. In-House: Costs, Benefits, and ROI Analysis.
  17. Policy Analysis. (2025, September). How Will the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Transform Medicaid? [Video analysis].
  18. The Joint Commission. (2025). Accreditation for Psychiatric Hospitals.
  19. NPR / Shots Health News. (2025, May 8). Hospitals’ Mental Health Units Rely Heavily on Medicaid. Deep Cuts Could Force Closures.
  20. WRAL News. (2024, January). North Carolina Faces State Psychiatric Bed Crisis, Has Lost Half of Its State Psychiatric Beds.
  21. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024). Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
  22. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024). Psychiatric Hospitals — Conditions of Participation.

Disclaimer: This white paper is prepared for informational purposes and represents the analysis and perspective of The Moore Medical Group. Statistical data cited herein is drawn from publicly available, authoritative sources as referenced. Facility-specific financial projections are not contained in this document; such projections are produced through MMG’s complimentary facility-specific cost-benefit review process and are based on data provided by the individual facility. This document does not constitute financial, legal, or regulatory advice. Readers are encouraged to consult qualified advisors for facility-specific guidance.

© 2026 The Moore Medical Group

MMG ELIGIBILITY OVERLAY Step 1: 9-question prescreen form Step 2: Qualify message + GHL calendar embed ============================================================ –>